T.P. Caruso & Associates

Envisioning a digital infrastructure for a Learning Health System

Archives for Biomedical IT

The “How” Answer to the “Why-How-What” Question that All Businesses Must Ask Themselves

Comments Off

Triggered by the book Start with Why by Simon Sinek few weeks ago, I wrote the blog titled Changing Healthcare One BITT(tm) at a Time about WHY the Biomedical Informatics Think Tank(tm) exists: to contribute to the building of a digital infrastructure that supports the Learning Health System as defined by the Institute of Medicine.  The question here is HOW the BITT will attain this objective:

  • BITT will produce content that reflects the expertise and creative ideas of its academic members, promoting their ability to contribute to a New Exchange Architecture (see Content Intentions);
  • BITT will create innovative solutions that provide novel approaches to health information management which insures personal health information privacy and allows ease of health information access by authorized individuals;
  • BITT will recruit the leading thinkers in academia as members to develop and test these innovative solutions, continuously driving the technology forward;
  • BITT will partner with the academic institutions of its members to leverage their exceptional intellectual manpower, advanced facilities, and close ties to medical centers who might pilot the innovative solutions;
  • BITT will partner with private institutions, both for-profit and not-for-profit, to find the most effective means of implementing these innovative solutions;
  • BITT will obtain funding through a wide array of vehicles and from both public and private sources, providing consulting to organizations that benefit from BITT expertise and resources, obtaining government grants and contracts for developing various innovative projects and pilots, spinning-off non-profits to support the infrastructure required to provide the innovative solutions, and investing in businesses that develop applications which use this infrastructure; and
  • BITT will reward independence of its workforce and partners who strive to establish attainable goals that transforms the health information management infrastructure.

If we implement BITT as proposed above, BITT will be successful because its members, academic and non-academic partners, employees, and sponsors will all benefit by advancing their careers or missions, and by unquestionably being part of a transformation of the modern health system.

The Biomedical Informatics Think Tank(tm) and BITT(tm) are trademarks of T.P. Caruso & Associates, LLC.

Jun 19, 2011

Why Change Healthcare One BITT at a Time?

Comments Off

Healthcare systems in the USA and in many other countries around the world, are not working, and the members the Biomedical Informatics Think Tank(c) also called BITT(c) want to do our part to provide real solutions.  With extensive experience in biomedical informatics including health informatics and analytics, clinical research informatics, and bioinformatics, we think that many of these solutions are based in improvements in the health IT infrastructure.  I envision a digital infrastructure that supports the Learning Health System concepts as defined by the Institute of Medicine.

“…a learning healthcare system in which each patient care experience naturally reflects the best available evidence, and, in turn, adds seamlessly to learning what works best in different circumstances.”

(Also see their report Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Healthcare: Workshop Series Summary and their Series on the Learning Health System).

Envision a health system that is personalized (i.e. individual-centric vs. patient-centric) with a focus on prevention and health information privacy.  Envision a health system which minimizes the number of people who need to see a doctor, show up at an emergency room, need admission for surgery, or even require medication.  Envision an individual having various touch points through which they can learn to become healthier individuals, through their churches and other community organizations, as well as through mobile phone apps, social networking, and, of course, their family and primary care provider.  Consider that BITT pursues interests in health social networking and their use by a broad set of stakeholders in providing health to the individual in various settings.

Envision that an individual’s personal health information will only be shared with those who the individual wants to see it, and those who see it may not share it with anyone else without that individual’s permission.  Envision that the individual does not need to give protected health information to anyone, not even their primary care provider since they can manage their care without it.  Envision that an individual’s entire history of health information is available to that individual and their assignees at any location, and that any individual can discover easily who has accessed that information and why it has been accessed.  Envision that an individual can even make money by allowing researchers to access their unidentifiable health information, increasing their motivation to support research.   Consider that BITT is creating technology as part of a proposed “universal exchange language” that would allow secure aggregation with that allows for a never identified patient.

Envision researchers, care providers and even individuals easily accessing ALL “consented” health information in a secure health data cloud, not just the “consented” health information available at a particular health institution, and that health information can not give away anyone’s identity.  Envision that access to this information happens so quickly it can be used to assist in making personalized decisions about an individuals care while a patient talks to their care provider about options and their likely and unlikely outcomes, all based on real evidence pulled from the health data cloud.  Consider that BITT has various activities to encourage the development of just such a health data cloud for a “new exchange architecture” (NEArch) that would include a “universal exchange language” (UEL) which would support improved comparative effectiveness research and other types of clinical and translational research (white paper here).

Envision clinical decision support systems (CDSS) apps for individuals as well as physicians that help in accessing and making sense of the information in this health data cloud.  Envision that these tools can provide care plan options with additional sources of information for the individual or provider to pursue.  Envision that these tools estimate the likelihood of specific outcomes based on various input factors which can be personalized for a particular individual possibly through a tie between the CDSS applications and an individual’s personal health record (though not their protected health information).  Envision CDSS applications that model the functions of the human body considering various environmental and genetic factors.  Envision these tools allow physicians to predict the outcomes of various behavioral, drug, or surgical interventions.  Envision that these applications base their advice on the latest Clinical Practice Guidelines.  Consider that BITT pursues opportunities to fund the design and development of such applications as defined in the National Research Council’s report titled Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions.

The Biomedical Informatics Think Tank works towards these goals “changing healthcare one BITT at a time.”

™ Biomedical Informatics Think Tank and BITT are trademarks of Projectivity, Inc.  BITT is a division of Projectivity, Inc.

Jun 4, 2011

Inspire don’t Manipulate

Comments Off

As the result of a watching a TED talk video about Simon Sinek I purchased Start with Why, Sinek’s book that provides more detail than the talk.  After saying in chapter 1 what he said so eloquently in the TED video, in chapter 2 Sinek writes:

There are only two ways to influence human behavior: you can manipulate it or you can inspire it…Typical manipulations include: dropping price; running a promotion; using fear, peer pressure or aspirational messages; and promising innovation to influence behavior – be it a purchase, a vote or support.

He also writes that those companies that have an unclear idea about the reasons customers buy their product are very likely to use manipulation to make their sales because manipulations to sell products and services.  Companies pay a price for manipulation, usually in product quality and, eventually, competitiveness, sales and profitability.

The alternative is to inspire your customers, as, Sinek says, does Apple for instance.  Inspiring customers requires an understanding of what your potential customers want to buy.  By purchasing an Apple iPhone or computer, an individual reinforces their desire to be perceived as unique and different (1).  The image of a different product that stands out in a world of commodity smart phones and computers Apple uses to inspire its potential customers to buy their products.

As for the business I am currently developing, the Biomedical Informatics Think Tank ™ has, initially, potential customers in government agencies interested in improving healthcare, as well as academics leading in defining a biomedical informatics infrastructure for population studies, clinical effectiveness research, public health research, CDSS design and translational research.  In fact, if the latter group is inspired to join the BITT ™, as 21 individuals have already joined, I’m confident that the resulting think tank will be what attracts the potential customers in government agenices.  Thus, my focus is on attracting a strong team with exciting projects.

 

May 21, 2011

PCORI Would Benefit from HIT Experts on their Board of Governors

Comments Off

I attended the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Board of Governors (BOG) meeting today in New York City.  Once again, as with both the Institute of Medicine and Air Force Medical Services/NIH meetings last week, I’m awed by the desire to improve care and the outstanding nature of the professionals in the room.  This meeting may have been the most star-studded with both Francis Collin, Director of NIH and Carolyn Clancy, Director of the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research sitting on the Board of Governors with many other leaders in comparative (or is it clinical?) effectiveness research (CER).  Clearly members of the BOG want PCORI to do things differently with a greater focus on the needs of the patient.

Once again I stood up in the middle of the meeting, when given the chance to make a comment for the PCORI public record that health IT experts were not represented in this meeting, and for that matter, CER experts were also not represented in meetings of the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT.  In the process I mention my affiliation with the Biomedical Informatics Think Tank™ a division of Projectivity, Inc. giving further information about the membership being made up of 21, mostly academic leaders in biomedical informatics.  I expect that some people who have attended more than one of these events, like I have, know who I am and that the focus of BITT™ is to fill the knowledge gap between ONC and CER to bridge these two important efforts.

Except for that clear branding this effort has certainly achieved among those who are listening, I’m concerned that I am not being heard.  I need a more definitive message where people will understand why they need to involve health IT in CER methodology planning, and why they need to get involved as CER experts in heath IT infrastructure policy and standards development.

I’ll have to work on that message.

 

Filed under AHRQ, Biomedical IT, CER, NIH, ONC, PCORI
May 16, 2011

Health Informatics Implementation vs. Innovation

Comments Off

The U.S.A. is pursuing a policy of updating the healthcare information technology infrastructure of its healthcare providers.  No one argues with the importance of this step in improving the quality of healthcare.  The discussion is only about how this is done and when these policy goals are to be met.  Simultaneous with this implementation effort, numerous other policies are being detailed and rolled out, one of which, in my opinion, is critical for long-term improvement of health care: increased support for comparative effectiveness research (CER).  The Biomedical Informatics Think Tank ™ and others in health informatics are thnking about how to do CER in the context of this new health IT infrastructure.  I want to encourage thinking about how this might look.  I want to step away from the constraints of an existing health IT infrastructure, and even those resulting from an evolution in this infrastructure towards a network of electronic health record (EHR) systems, and think about how CER might be done without constraint.  This approach will lead us to innovation in healthcare.

Let’s imagine a health information data cloud in which our personal health information is safe from unconsented use.  Let’s imagine that we can not only analyze at “atomic” views of this data for instance that “heart rate is 150 mmHg for an individual who has diabetes, lives in Japan, weighs 100 kg, and takes x, y, and z medications”, but also aggregations of this data that includes probabilities.  Let’s imagine that we can reaggregate the context of the health information without threatening the privacy and security of individuals.  Let’s imagine that all data in this health information data cloud is in a standard language where, for instance, MI means myocardial infarction and nothing else.  Let’s imagine that we can get the information we need to do research from this data with the resources available freely to us on the Internet.

Let’s think about what that health information data cloud could look like.  Let’s think about how we could make such a cloud work to insure individual privacy and security.  Let’s think about who would pay for this cloud.   Let’s think about what would be the optimum requirements for this cloud.  Let’s think about the fastest ways to get useful health information from this cloud.  Let’s think about where we could test this cloud.  Let’s build, test and build again this health data cloud.

Let’s not implement.  Let’s innovate.

If you have a vision that you would like to pursue, please join us as a member of the Biomedical Informatics Think Tank(tm).  Contact me at tcaruso2@gmail.com.

(tm) Biomedical Informatics Think Tank is a trademark of Projectivity, Inc.

May 16, 2011